Answer: Out group Favoritism
Explanation: Generally, it is normal for people to tend to categorize themselves and other people into sets. when individuals categorize other people as being part of their group , such individuals consider themselves as grouping of others , and other people not in their circle as out group. this tends to make such individual see the other group much more than their group and to sometimes negatively classify the out group which he or she does not belong to as opposed to the in group they belong to.
Out group favoritism explains that under certain conditions, people will prefer and have affinity for one's out-group over the in-group, which can be seen in one's expression in the evaluation of the outgroup and in terms of allocation of resources.
Here, eight-year-old Jennifer, an African American, who describes the white, wealthier girls in her school as "pretty," "smart," and "nice," whereas she describes the black, poorer girls as "bossy," "average," and "chubby." is expressing Out group favoritism
A big increase in government spending is an example of a positive demand shock.
A demand shock is a sudden event that increases or decreases demand for goods or services temporarily. A positive demand shock increases aggregate demand and a negative demand shock decreases aggregate demand. Therefore there will be an initial inflation with the shock but since demand shocks are temporary and the central bank commits to an inflation rate target, then over time inflation will fall back down to the inflation target.
Expansionary fiscal policy is an increase in government spending or a decrease in taxation, while contractionary fiscal policy is a decrease in government spending or an increase in taxes. Expansionary fiscal policy can be used by governments to stimulate the economy during a recession.
Learn about positive demand shock:
brainly.com/question/14528859
#SPJ4
Answer:
Politician like William M. Tweed, more known as Boss Tweed, was similar to industrial magnate like Carnegie and Rockefeller because he, like Carnegie and Rockefeller, had a lot of control over different things. He was an advisor at the gas companies and various banks, he was a director of the Erie Railroads so all of these possesions directly linked him to events happening in the country - U.S. economy and government related events.
The answer is Mecca I know that because I just had a test on that subject.
I hope this helped.
