The greatest impetus for Oklahoma statehood<span> began after the Land Run of ... Before the passage of the</span>Oklahoma<span> Enabling Act (1906), </span>four statehood plans<span> evolved. ... </span>Indians<span> in O.T. were held in trust by the federal government for twenty-</span>one<span> ... Indian leaders and whites in Indian Territory (I.T.) </span>favored<span> double</span>statehood.<span>The Territory of </span>Oklahoma<span> was an organized incorporated territory of the United States that ... Until this point, </span>Native Americans<span> had exclusively used the land. ... was </span>one<span> of the main supporters of the opening of </span>Oklahoma<span> to white settlement. .... due to the growing idea of </span>statehood<span>, which had originated in Indian Territory.</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In 1915, the Germans sank the RMS Lusitania, which killed 1,197 people. Not the titanic.
A. Arms reduction is the correct answer
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
5th amendment: right to a just trial
6th amendment: right to a speedy trial