Answer:
the dirty harry problem
Explanation:
The dirty harry problem is a scenario usually common within the law enforcement agency such as the police or in the military. The dirty harry problem is a moral dilemma that arises whereby an officer is faced with making an urgent and decisive call along the line of duty, of which such call or decision is against the ethics or protocols laid down for engagement, but which, if taken would be beneficial or bring a greater good to the society and all even if the means of achieving such seem unacceptable.
From the information given in the question about having to make a decision that seem morally unacceptable in other to achieve a moral good, the dillemma you are faced with as an officer can be referred to as <em>the dirty harry problem.</em>
Answer: a donkey and a Colt.
Explanation:
The disciples brought to Jesus what he(Jesus) sent them(his disciples); the donkey and the Colt. The evidence of this can be found in the book of the Bible. In the book of Matthew Chapter 21 verse 1 - 7, it says and I quote;
''As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples,saying to them, "Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will find a donkey tied there, with her colt by her. Untie them and bring them to me...'' ( New international version, Mathew 21 verse 1-2).
When you looked at the verse 2 of the book, he(Jesus) sent them to go and find a donkey. Now, let us look at the verse 7 of the book, it says;
''They brought the donkey and the colt and placed their cloaks on them for Jesus to sit on''.( New international version, Mathew 21 verse 7).
So, verse 7 gives us the answer to the question; ...''they brought the donkey and the Colt...''.
Answer:
the "weaponizing of anthropology"
Explanation:
Programs like Human Terrain Systems Program and the Minerva Institute Initiative fall under controversial issues because some people find them problematic. Some say that these programs are "weaponizing anthropology" because they go against the<u> "Code of Ethics" </u><em>("do no harm to those they study")</em> being followed by anthropologists. This means that the information collected by the anthropologists will be used for military purposes against humans (which contradicts the Code of Ethics). This also provided the possibility that <u>anthropology will be connected to war machines.</u>
So, this explains the answer.
