The most straightforward answer is D - using an individual's genetic information to decide who can be covered for health insurance.
This is unethical because people have no say over which genes they were born with. Furthermore, applying this logic would mean that we are proponents of genetic determinism. While genes have an impact, a person can still choose to apply different protocols in his life that help him combat his chances for certain diseases.
It could be also considered unethical if people themselves would be provided guidance based on the genetic information collected, without any proper medical consultation beforehand.
Answer:
it is necessary to do the additional trials before conclusion
Explanation:
These additional trials should be the same fertilizer on different plants
Answer:
A trait that is neutral in one environment may be advantageous in another.
Explanation:
Neutral variation refers to the variation (either genetic or phenotypic variation) which is unaffected by natural selection. Neutral variation is known to increase genetic variation, which is a prerequisite to evolutionary change. An allele may be neutral in one environment and beneficial (or deleterious) in another. In consequence, neutral variation in one environment may increase the response to selection in different environmental conditions.
There's no any exact scientific results and nobody currently know what will exactly happen, but some scientists suggested that the sun might expand and dies that leads to the end of the world but some says there will be a new sun being born and like that.
Most cells have a membrane, though some don't.
