You need to manage your time well and put every spare second towards it
THE NEW DEAL. Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal is the plan that brought the U.S. out of the Great Depression. It was sometimes thought to be an improvised plan, but was actually very thought out. Roosevelt was not afraid to involve the central government in addressing the economic problem. The basic plan was to stimulate the economy by creating jobs.
Answer:
<em>Special Interest Group</em>
Explanation:
A Special Interest Group <em>is a group within a larger company or entity with a shared interest in promoting a specific area of expertise, education, or innovation where participants collaborate in influencing or creating solutions within their specific field, and can interact, meet, and coordinate meetings.</em>
I think it’s A. Cause they produce the most copper compared to country A. And the other answers are talking abt country b producing More lead but that’s not true because country A produces more lead and and country A doesn’t have an a advantage in producing copper and lead because country B produces more copper than country A meaning they only have an advantage in producing more lead. And county a obviously doesn’t have an advantage for producing copper because country B produces copper in. In conclusion that’s what I think the answer is A
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4