The correct answer is "the downfall of the protagonist"
This is the whole purpose of plays, according to Aristotle. The protagonists in tragedies are usually people better than us who die for a great cause, and their death awakens both positive and negative emotions in us. This is called catharsis.
Answer:
In conclusion, although animals and humans can have some shared social and cognitive skills, language always requires more cognitive skills and learning a language is uniquely corresponds to human beings. Besides, animals cannot learn a human language, because animals cannot go futher than imitating and memorizing their owner’s words.
Explanation:
Answer:
C). Added introductory words or phrases.
Explanation:
Introductory words or phrases are described as the adverbs or interjections that are primarily employed to introduce a sentence in order to establish connectivity between the ideas and ensure a smooth transition.
In the given sentence, 'introductory words or phrases' have been added to revise the sentence. The introductory word 'because' functions to link the two ideas(I studied hard and I did well on the exam') together in a cause-and-effect structure. <u>It converts the first clause('I studied hard') into a 'dependent clause'('Because I studied hard') that is setting the stage for main clause to ensure a smooth transition between ideas and enhance its efficacy</u>. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
to persuade readers that rivers have a unique beauty
to entertain readers with poetic description of a river
Explanation:
I just took the Checkpoint :D
It has been frequently and rightly remarked that the Crito is unique among
Plato’s dialogues insofar as its primary concern is what Socrates ought to do.
2
Most interpreters assume that Socrates ought to do what seems best to his reason (Cr 46b3-6); thus, most interpretations defend the rationality of obedience
or disobedience. On my account, it is not at all obvious that Socrates ought to
do what seems best to his reason. On my account, Socrates does not do what
seems best to his reason because he does not reason about whether he should
obey the laws; he simply obeys the laws. Doubtless, this claim seems counterintuitive to many; after all, does not Socrates articulate and defend his reasons
for remaining in prison from 49c to 54c? Is it not the cogency of Socrates’ reasons
for remaining in prison that have been so thoroughly debated in the scholarship summarized below? My answer to both of these questions is ‘no.’ Perhaps
counter-intuitively I claim that the reasons for remaining in prison, from Crito
49c to54c, are not Socrates’ reasons; they are the arguments of the speaking laws
of Athens
