Was it necessary in 1787 to get rid of the Articles of Confederation and develop a new Constitution?

History

2 answers:

inessss [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

yes because:

The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Explanation:

uwu

Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

You might be interested in

What did mexicos failing economy lead to

lys-0071 [83]

i believe its trade agreement with the US.

4 0

3 years ago

By 1963, which of the following had not been achieved by the Civil Rights Movement?

Murrr4er [49]

C. winning the free exercise of voting rights

5 0

3 years ago

Why was the Monroe Doctrine written?

garri49 [273]

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine was drafted because the U.S. government was worried that European powers would encroach on the U.S. sphere of influence by carving out colonial territories in the Americas.

Explanation:

(google answer)

please don't :(

It was a protection over the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine was basically a foreign policy that couldn't have been sustained in 1823

I really hope this clears everything out.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As president, John Adams tried to reduce foreign influence over the U.S.

MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

D, John adams was a federalist and the opposing party had a lot of immigrants. He responded with a law that restricted immigrants voting rights.