1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maslowich
3 years ago
12

Which of the following does not fall into the realm of plagiarism, according to Plagiarism.org cited in the textbook? A. Giving

incorrect information about the source of a quotation. B. Paraphrasing a source that you cite C. Changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit D. Copying so many words and ideas that it forms the majority of your work
English
1 answer:
liq [111]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation.

Explanation:

Plagiarism simply means passing off another person's idea or thoughts as if they were your own. It means to copy and paste a piece of writing without duly referencing the original author of the work.

Plagiarism is considered as a serious offence in academic work and usually attracts very severe sanctions.

However, if a quotation is duly cited, then it does not fall into the realm of plagiarism.

You might be interested in
What connection does the author draw between physiology and psychological to a life-threatening incident​
evablogger [386]

This fear can spread rapidly and is not limited to those experiencing the event directly—others that are affected include family members of victims and survivors, and people who are exposed through broadcast images. Psychological suffering is usually more prevalent than the physical injuries from a terrorism event. Understanding these psychological consequences is critical to the nation's efforts to develop intervention strategies at the pre-event, event, and post-event phases that will limit the adverse psychological effects of terrorism.

7 0
3 years ago
11. The Saints and Strangers argued about how they would live in the New World. After much
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

an agreement.

Explanation:

The Mayflower compact was a document signed on a boat on the 11th of November, 1620 by forty-one (41) males of the one hundred and two (102) passengers on board while the boat was anchored in Provincetown Harbor (Cape Cod) due to the effect of turbulent storm. The document derived its name from the English ship known as Mayflower which was heading to Plymouth, Massachusetts due to storms and treacherous shoals rather than its original destination, which was the Colony of Virginia.

The Mayflower compact was a document which established a social contract and "rule of law" in order to make the pilgrims (saints) and non-pilgrims (strangers) remain loyal to King James 1, foster Christianity (Christian faith) and for the overall good of the colony.

Hence, the Saints and Strangers argued about how they would live in the New World. After much discussion, they came together and signed the Mayflower Compact.

Thus, the Compact was an agreement.

6 0
3 years ago
High school pharagraph in 8 sentence
Mandarinka [93]

High school is hell. You have to do so much homework. Listen to teachers waffle all day long and never get a long enough break between classes. High school is the best place to have fun with mates though. High school is fun when you are the best in everything only.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a restricting sentence​
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

a restrictive sentenced defines the meaning of a noun or noun phrase and provides necessary information about the noun in the sentence. it is not separated from the rest of the sentence by commas.

5 0
3 years ago
Read this excerpt from Rudolfo Anaya's essay "Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry,"
Anika [276]

The correct answer is C. Including words that address logic and reason

Explanation:

The purpose of an argument is to prove as valid a specific point of view usually by including reasons, evidence, examples, based on facts and logic. In the case of the excerpt presented, the author argues against censorship by explaining the importance of reading and highlighting how books are necessary for the spirit. Additionally, in this argument, the author provides mainly evidence based on emotions such as "Books nourish the spirit" or "we become freer and freer". In this context, one way to make the excerpt more argumentative is to introduce words or statements that are based on logic and reason because by introducing this type of objective evidence the author can better prove the importance of preventing censorship, and therefore the argument will be strengthened.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Even though they did not take place in the story, which of the following situations would fit the story of Beowulf thematically?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe "A newborn baby" In 3 sentences
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think Emily’s mother in “I Stand Here Ironing” is a reliable narrator? In a paragraph of 100 words, explain your answer u
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me on these 4 short questions mark u brain
    5·1 answer
  • The number of fail students have increased. find errors and rewrite.
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Spot the error and rewrite the correct sentence :
    11·1 answer
  • What are the experiences/lesson you've learned from the past year 2020​
    12·2 answers
  • What is one problem you see with social media?<br><br> what is one good thing about social media?
    9·2 answers
  • A Paragraph on Fashion
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!