Because of the low wages, it meant that the company had more money, which also meant more profits from their products. This meant that they could make more products for less money which also lowered the product's cost. This in turn lowered said cost to be smaller than their competition. That lowered cost meant that all other countries that made the same type product would stop and simply buy it from China. Therefore the answer would be B, Other countries quickly bought the low-priced products.
Answer:
Mónaco y Rumania se formaron mientras que Estados Unidos de América se consolidó.
Explanation:
Mónaco y Rumania son los estados soberanos que se formaron mientras que los estados unidos de américa se consolidaron durante 1859 a 1871. Mónaco es frontera con Francia al norte, mientras que el Mediterráneo está presente al este, oeste y sur de Mónaco. Rumanía está situada en el sureste de Europa. después de la guerra civil estadounidense que ocurre entre 1861 y 1865, los Estados Unidos de América es un país soberano que se consolidó como un solo estado.
Answer:
I think Vladimir Lenin
Explanation:
First I think you spelled his name wrong.
Also because it ( yes I did search it up) it says that he was the elder brother of Vladimir Lenin , the founder of the Soviet Union.
hope it helps
Answer and Explanation
The Justice Fortas was an associate justice of supreme Court of the United states. In 1965 after the principals of the schools warned the students that they would be suspended if they wore the armbands. But the students wore the armbands and with parental support fought the school district in court to uphold their First Amendment right to express their opposition to the war in school in the manner in which they did. During this case case Justice Fortas ruled in favor of the students for the following basic reasons:
- The justices reasoned that neither “students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
- justices noted that the school officials specifically targeted anti-war armbands, but did not prohibit the wearing of any other symbols conveying a political message