Answer:
State unemployment tax payable A/c Dr $168
To Cash A/c $168
(Being state unemployment taxes are paid for cash)
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the payment of the unemployment taxes is shown below:
State unemployment tax payable A/c Dr $168
To Cash A/c $168
(Being state unemployment taxes are paid for cash)
For recording this transaction, we debited the State unemployment tax payable as it increase the liability and cash account should be credited as it reduce the current assets
In order to increase the readability, Miguel can use:
- Shorter lines.
- Columns.
- Boxes.
<h3>Improving readability </h3>
Miguel can use shorter lines so that the chances of people getting lost when reading a sentence is reduced. He can also present the information in different columns for more organization.
Another way to organize the information can be in boxes. These can explain concepts away from the text so that the report is less cluttered.
In conclusion, there are several ways to increase readability.
Find out more on readability at brainly.com/question/3923453.
The equal opportunity Act of 1972 strengthened the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by
- issuing guidelines for employer conduct.
- mandating specific record keeping procedures.
<h3>What is the Equal Employment Opportunity Act?</h3>
This is the act of the government that helps to ensure that all employers treat people of the US in all befitting ways regardless of their genders, race and skin.
The act talked against discrimination, it upheld compensation and the work condition of employees.
Read more on Equal Employment Opportunity Act brainly.com/question/14774625
#SPJ1
Answer:
This is a repeat question on Brainly but here you go.
<h2><em>
$51,500
</em></h2>
Whether original cost or replacing cost is given in the question but we considered that cost in which the partner give their consent
So, the equipment amount should be debited at <em>$51,500
</em> instead of the original cost or the replacing cost
Answer:
(B) Nonmoney property distributions made by an S corporation having accumulated E&P are treated differently when determining the corporateminuslevel gain recognized under Sec. 311 than are property distributions made by an S corporation without accumulated E&P.
Explanation: