1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
3 years ago
13

What was the point of the nativism historical context?

History
1 answer:
ikadub [295]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Nativism is the political policy of promoting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants including the support of immigration restriction measures

Explanation:

have a nice day :)

You might be interested in
The american public began to distrust the johnson administration because of the.
slavikrds [6]
Deco republicans hope this works
8 0
2 years ago
If a state law and a federal law give different rules about the same thing, which law is supreme?
zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What two good things came out of the Cold War during the 1960s?
Advocard [28]
Nuclear test ban treaty and the non proliferation treaty
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was there a strong debate surrounding the annexation of Texas
emmainna [20.7K]
When Texas split from Mexico in 1836, its citizens were largely in favor of annexation by the US. Most of US political leaders, however, were against it. One main issue was that Texas practiced slavery. Political leaders feared that dealing with Texas's slavery would stir up even greater controversy. Perhaps an even greater concern, though, was that Mexico was not happy about the loss of Texas. US political leaders feared the war that the annexation of Texas would no doubt spark
8 0
3 years ago
Who presents evidence to a Grand Jury?
snow_tiger [21]

A grand jury is a panel of citizens called for service just like a trial jury (also called a “petit jury”) in a criminal or civil case. But a grand jury's function is different. A prosecutor presents evidence and the grand jurors decide whether it establishes that the accused probably committed a crime.

Answer is The Prosecutor (a .)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The MPLA was able to gain control of Angola by using Soviet-paid, Cuban troops.<br> True or False?
    6·2 answers
  • What made people flock to the renaissance
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the only president to hold political office after his presidency
    10·1 answer
  • How are today’s communication technologies and communicators different from those Orwell imagined in “1984”?
    11·1 answer
  • If you could be anyone or do anything what would it be and why
    13·2 answers
  • How did the British impact China in the early 1800s
    7·1 answer
  • What was the initial reaction to the proposed npt back in the 1970's? select one:
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a characteristic of the Dark Ages?
    5·1 answer
  • Give evidence of this central claim.
    12·1 answer
  • Would you agree with the view that the message of Universal rights was
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!