1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
8

What is special about the Red October?

History
2 answers:
Licemer1 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Appearance. In the film, Red October appears much like a standard Typhoon-class submarine though she has a number of significant differences. The aft section of the submarine contains two ducts for the caterpillar drive. The upper rudder carries a towed sonar array which typical Typhoon-class submarines do not feature.

Explanation:

Anastasy [175]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Appearance. In the film, Red October appears much like a standard Typhoon-class submarine though she has a number of significant differences. The aft section of the submarine contains two ducts for the caterpillar drive. The upper rudder carries a towed sonar array which typical Typhoon-class submarines do not feature.

HOPE THIS HELPS

You might be interested in
Pls help - - - Historians would most likely questionmarco polo,s credibility as a historical source because he:
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The answer is A)has no pictures to support his claims

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a main reason for the growth of cities and suburbs in the late 1800s and early 1900s? Question 2 opti
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

The main reason for the growth of cities and suburbs in late 1800s and early 1900s was transportation innovations such as trolleys,streetcars and elevated roads.

Explanation:Mass transit system evolved.This helped large number of people to commute to work from distant places.Earlier transportation was not developed so it was hard for people residing in villages to commute to cities in search of their work .They had to work in villages in to earn a livelihood.Economic condition of farmers was poor .But transportation system was not developed enough to enable villagers to move to cities but with good and easy transportation they move to cities and settled their.This led to the growth of cities.

Industries began to grow rapidly in cities.Wealthier families move outside the cities and created the suburbs.Industrialization created many jobs and urged many more people to move to cities.New large cities such as Denver ,Chicago,Cleveland developed inland along new transportation routes.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was Delaware important to the Union strategy​
zzz [600]

Answer:

Delaware represented the nation as a whole on what really mattered. For instance, the states rights, slavery and support for the Union case.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements is a correct implication of the author's argument?
kykrilka [37]

The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.

The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:

  • Indochina War
  • Watergate case

These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.

This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949

Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.

In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.

Learn more in:

3 0
3 years ago
How did mussolini​ guarantee​ that Fascism was the only​ political party by 1926?
romanna [79]

<span>Mussolini’s road to a dictatorship took much longer than Hitler’s in 1933. Hitler was appointed chancellor on January 30th 1933. By April 1st 1933, his power was such that, after the Enabling Act, Hitler could only be seen as the dictator of Nazi Germany regardless of Hindenburg’s presidency. </span><span>Mussolini’s public posturing and boasts did not guarantee loyalty in Italy – hence why it was so important for him to establish a relationship with the Roman Catholic Church. He only gained what could be described as dictatorial powers after the Lateran Treaty whereby he could guarantee loyalty from those Catholics who may well have not been supporters of the fascist state in Italy.</span>

<span>Mussolini took years to achieve what could be defined as a dictatorship. He achieved some semblance of power after the March on Rome in 1922 when he was appointed Prime Minister of Italy. But his government contained a mixture of men with different political beliefs – similar to Hitler’s position in January 1933.</span>

But his time in power almost collapsed after the murder of Matteotti when great anger gripped Italy. If he had been a true dictator in 1922, then such an uproar would never have happened as his enemies and the Italian people in general would have been cowed into submission.

Mussolini started his time in power by buying support from both the working class and the industrial bosses.

<span>The workers were promised an eight hour day while an enquiry into the profits made by the industrialists during World War One was dropped. The rich benefited from a reduction in death duties – now, under Mussolini, more of what someone had earned during their lifetime, went to their family and not the government. To get support from the Roman Catholic Church, religious education was made compulsory in all elementary schools.</span>

<span>These policies can be seen as an attempt to ‘buy’ support. As an example, in 1933 Hitler introduced workers holidays into Germany (similar to a bank holiday). This was very popular. He then almost immediately banned trade unions which protected workers rights. Any protests over this were banned as a result of the Enabling Act – Hitler did not bargain with anyone. Mussolini was not in a position whereby he could assert his authority and it is probable that the extent of his dictatorial powers never did equal those acquired by Hitler.</span>

Mussolini had never intended to share power with the liberals who were in the government. He introduced a Fascist Grand Council which would decide policy for Italy without consulting the non-fascists in the government first.

<span>In February 1923, Mussolini and the Fascist Grand Council introduced the Acerbo Law. This law changed election results. Now if one party got just 25% (or more) of the votes cast in an election, they would get66%of the seats in parliament.</span>

When it came for Parliament to vote on the Acerbo Law, many politicians agreed to a law that would almost certainly end their political careers if they were not fascists. Why did they do this?

The gallery in the hall in which the politicians voted was filled with armed fascist thugs who had a good view of anybody who spoke out against the law. The threat was clear and real. If you voted for the law, you would be fine. If you did not, then you were certainly in danger from fascist thugs.

<span>Mussolini did say in the spring of 1924 that “a good beating did not hurt anyone.”</span>

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. How did Abigail Adams manage her household economy during wartime?
    14·1 answer
  • How was leisure time different on farms compared to cities?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP!! AS SOON AS POSSIBLE !!<br><br> what are examples of providing for the common defense ?
    7·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    9·1 answer
  • Complete the following chart describing the principles of the U.S. Constitution.​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a major concern of the Anti-Federalists?
    7·1 answer
  • 3. Which state was admitted as a free state in 1820?
    9·1 answer
  • In regards to religion what is the meaning of the excerpt
    8·1 answer
  • which groups of people made up most of the workers on the railroad? chinese and irish immigrants, and african americans chinese
    6·1 answer
  • pamphlet authored by william lloyd garrison arguing that black people must be recognized as part of american society, not viewed
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!