Answer: $178,000
Explanation:
The following information can be derived from the question:
We have to first calculate the total manufacturing cost. This will be:
Direct material 29000
Add: Direct labor 58000
Add: manufacturing overhead 82000
Then the manufacturing cost will be:
= 29000 + 58000 + 82000
= 169000
We then add the beginning work in progress and then subtract the ending work in progress. This will be:
Manufacturing cost = 169000
Add: Beginning WIP = 66000
Less: Ending WIP = 57000
= 169000 + 66000 - 57000
= $178,000
This should NOT be considered when setting a current budget
Future income
Explanation:
Future income can be anticipated but never factored in.
This is because the economy is not only controlled by economic policy or statistics that anticipate growth but outside influences too.
For example, despite the productive growth in the recent time there will be decrease in incomes throughout the world this year.
This is because of the recent crisis that was not foreseen at all.
Thus policy making must not see the future as anything granted and must only set up goals for the present and only anticipate what would probably come in the future.
It can be said that kent and julie have Low Inter-rater Reliability.
<h3>
What is Inter-rater Reliability?</h3>
- Inter-rater reliability is a statistical metric used to assess the degree of consensus among various judges or raters.
- It is employed as a method of evaluating the accuracy of the responses generated by various test items.
- A test's lower inter-rater reliability may be a sign that its questions are obscure, difficult to understand, or even superfluous.
- The percentage of items that the judges agree on can be calculated as a straightforward technique to assess inter-rater reliability.
- This is referred to as percent agreement, and it always falls between 0 and 1, with 0 denoting complete disagreement among raters and 1 denoting perfect agreement.
To know more about Inter-rater Reliability with the given link
brainly.com/question/14316125
#SPJ4
Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.
