Answer:
That every person is born as equal as another human being. Doesn't matter where you're from, how you look or who you are.
D. that she may profit from the building project
Look at the evidence within the question information. The author has 20 years of experience in construction and owns a local construction company. So if the city or town is considering a building initiative that will cost the town millions of dollars, the author of the editorial quite possibly hopes to bid for some of that construction work. It would be very good for her business.
Now, the fact that a construction company owner favors the building initiative doesn't mean her views should be rejected simply because of her position in the construction industry. If her views are valid and provide solid arguments in favor of the project, those views should be considered on their merits. At the same time, perspectives from other local citizens should be considered too, in terms of environmental impact of the project, costs and affordability, how the building initiative will benefit residents of the community, etc.
Answer:
Like said the protest were non-violent, no chaos, no police having to make arrest it was all just peace.
Explanation:
Your answer would be Pythagoras ;)
The tariff debate of 1827 and 1828 was mainly brought about
by the depression of American industries. A tax was implemented on foreign
goods and that made the nationally produced products much cheaper. The south
was totally unhappy over the taxes implemented. The raw materials came to the
south but the finished product did not have any market. This tax raised the
prices of their finished product. The people of the south opposed this tax
vociferously because it did not benefit them in any way.
