The first being the material appeal of the objects that are taken, but more importantly, <span>they regard “getting away with it” as a demonstration of personal competence.
When a shoplifter managed to steal the goods without being spotted, they tend to felt some sort of accomplishment because they feel that they've oursmarted to store owner.</span>
All the towns streets met at the plaza
Their just being nice it's not gay
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The Boston Sons of Liberty showed their opposition on December 16, 1773, when they threw tea being brought into the American colonies by the British East India Company overboard the sea. The event is known as the Boston Tea Party and it was a result of the <em>Tea Act</em> passed by the British Parliament who gave their company the monopoly to import tea to the colonies.
2. I think that they decided to destroy the tea because if it got to the American colonies, they would be bought by people and this would affect the sales of tea by the American traders who sourced their tea from the Dutch. The taxes imposed on this tea as well as the monopoly that was granted to the British East India Company would also have negative consequences on the economy of the colonists.
3. They might have allowed the tea to land and then explain to the people reasons why they should boycott it. I do not think that this would have been effective because some people would have still found a way to buy the tea once it was within their reach.
4. Activism, lobbying, dialogue with the appropriate authorities, and peaceful protests should be the best routes to consider in countering laws perceived as unjust by the American citizenry.
I think it was A but in not positive.
