Answer:
The most effective responses will be those aimed at restoring harmony between supervisors, allowing all sectors to work efficiently. The least effective responses will be those that seek to help only one supervisor or just one, or some sectors, to the detriment of the others.
Explanation:
As we can see, Jamie is in a situation where his management is very important. This is because the sector of the 9 supervisors on the front line of a given service, are in conflict with each other, which ends up harming the company's success, since it is necessary that all sectors work together.
The meeting established by Jamie, has the responsibility to evaluate the arguments of the supervisors and choose those that will bring an effective result within the company. Jamie must choose as efficient the arguments that show cooperative forms among supervisors, which promote the good functioning of all sectors. However, he must consider as non-efficient, all those arguments that provide separatist ideas and that promote the growth of only some sectors to the detriment of others.
Both served immigrants of mostly European descent.
Both served immigrants of mostly Asian descent.
Both often detained immigrants for weeks or months.
Both required that immigrants pass health inspections.
The answer to your question is True. The supreme court can rule certain laws unconstitutional through cases.
The primary thrust of the original intent and wording of the tenth amendment is that states have certain powers that the national gov't cannot get over upon.
This 10th amendment deals with the ability to limit the powers of the federal government by reserving those particular powers to the states and to the people also.
The Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time when the Constitution was adopted by the government, where the powers not granted to the federal government were reserved to particular states or to its people. The amendment also states in the truism that all is retained which on the other hand has not been surrendered.
There is nothing that exists in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than the declaration of the relationship between the national as well as state government as it had already been established by the Constitution before the purpose of amendment and of that its purpose was other than to devote fears that the new government policy might get to exercise powers which is not to be granted, and that of the states might not be able to exercise their respected reserved powers fully.
In general, the state will have certain power as the national federal govt cannot cross upon its powers which were declared as the primary thrust of the intent which is original.
Learn to know more about the powers according to the 10th amendment on
brainly.com/question/24908771
#SPJ4
