Answer:
Explanation:
Advantages
1. A monarchy is regarded as one of the most stable forms of government.
2. Monarchies reduce the levels of political divide in a country.
3. Most monarchies rule from a centrist approach.
4. It is possible to reduce or eliminate corruption within the boundaries of a monarchy.
5. There are opportunities to refresh the government.
6. Monarchy leaders are trained from birth to become leaders.
Disadvantages
1. Monarchies can require minors to serve as their country’s head of state.
2. It can be difficult to stop the powers of the monarchy.
3. There is no guarantee of competency coming from the leadership
4. A monarchy can decide to remove all checks and balances.
5. Monarchies create a class-based society.
I think some people didn't really care about it , it really depends on who you are.Some people like Monarchs because it helps society have order and others think that its horrible because Monarchs decide on what you can and can't do and they try to gain too much power/
Answer:
Mesopotamia is considered the birthplace of agriculture. Another big difference between Mesopotamia is that people in Summer built magnificent buildings called Ziggurats (the equivalent of a Pyramid for the Egyptians). Those Ziggurats were built to honor their gods
Explanation:
Answer:
The author points to Levitt and Smith, as well as Marshll as inspirations for using numbers to investigate problems because:
they made efort to connect their works with real world problems.
Thinking like them offer to sports analysis
That numbers will sometimes disprove conventional wisdom
Explanation:
The studies on sports efficacy under economical and statistical models to obtain a coefficient of price over win is a revolutionary approach to calculate the number of resources a team needs to use to win. This approach has managed to find efficacy in teams as a whole and the contribution of players in the system as an effective system. It has enhanced analysts and researchers the ability to understand when the team can use its resources in its best way. This has left behind conventional wisdom on players and teams to bring statistical approaches and knowledge based on deductions to find efficacy in real-world sports problems.
Answer: inattentional blindness
Explanation:
This refers to how we tend to zoom out of everything around us and zoom in to what seems important to us at that particular moment trusting that our schemas will assist us with other things.
Since our cognitive and processing ability is limited it gives us sufficient time to focus our utmost attention to what matters more at that time.
Sometimes this happen because we don't expect certain things to happen in certain situation like standing in a checkout you are not really expecting that someone may be robbing a person just in day light.
