Answer:
cross-sectional study
Explanation:
Dr. Milano compares the performance of a group of 20-year-olds, a group of 45-year-olds, and a group of 70-year-olds on several tests of fluid intelligence and several tests of crystallized intelligence. Dr. Milano's investigation BEST exemplifies a <u>cross-sectional study</u>. A cross-sectional study is a type of observational study that analyzes data from a population, or a representative subset, at a specific point in time, it involves the use of different set of people who differ in the trait of interest. For example, the effect of age on intelligence level will involve the selection of subjects across the cross-section of ages of interest.
The proper to lifestyles includes right to stay with human dignity might mean the lifestyles of any such right up to the quit of herbal lifestyles. however, the court docket appears to approve passive euthanasia by means of preserving that one may additionally have the right to die with dignity as a part of the right to live with dignity
Answer:
France was effectively contained by strong neighboring powers.
Explanation:
The results of the Congress of Viena created a new European landscape.
Delegates caused a reconfiguration of European geopolitical system:
<em>Since European powers wanted to reset back to pre Napoleonic times, the goal of containing France was to restore the old limits and resize the distribution of land so they could create a way of balancing each other and remain in peace.</em>
Metternich was one of the key delegates: he wanted to avoid future wars with France, so he restored power back to Europe's royal families and France was forced to return the territories it once gained from Napoleon in 1795, till 1810.
<u>This meant that Russia increased its influence over Poland and Finland.</u>
<u>In the case of the Austrians, their power was limited in order to preserve peace. </u>
your answer would be 13 because i looked on a .gov website and it said that all children until 13 years have to ride in the backseat properly restrained
Appeal to the person is fallacy of rejecting a statement on the grounds that it comes from a particular person.
<h3>What is appeal to the person?</h3>
Appeal to the person is statement of fallacy which is on the basis of confirminng or rejecting that something is real base on the opinion of the person. Some other examples of fallacy include common belief fallacy, Ethnos appeal, appeal for popularity and so on.
Therefore, Appeal to the person is fallacy of rejecting a statement on the grounds that it comes from a particular person.
Learn more on Appeal from the link below.
brainly.com/question/10453411.
