Answer:
x - 99 ≤ -104 → 2nd line
x - 51 ≤ -43 → 1st line
150 + x ≤ 144 → 4th line
75 < 69 - x → 3rd line
Step-by-step explanation:
Ugh! Wow, this is going to be tedious, thanks alot, bro (jk, I got your back).
x - 99 ≤ -104
+ 99 + 99
x ≤ -5
There should be a line going from -5 to negative infinity (AKA the left) with a FILLED circle. So, the second one is correct.
x - 51 ≤ -43
+ 51 + 51
x ≤ 8
There should be an arrow with a FILLED circle going to negative infinity (AKA the left). So, the first one is correct.
I'm going to take a shortcut and notice that one of the lines has a filled circle while the other one has an empty circle. So the empty circle must relate to the question without a ≤ or ≥, but with a < or >. We see that 75 < 69 doesn't have ≤ or ≥ but a '<.' So this one must have the empty circle, which is on line 3. The last equation has to be on line 4.
Answer:
The sequence is not geometric or arithmetic because there is no common difference or common ratio between each term.
Not a Geometric or Arithmetic Sequence
The square of a prime number is not prime.
a) let x ∈ R, If x ∈ {prime numbers}, then 
∉{prime numbers}
there says that if x is a real and x is in the set of the prime numbers, then the square of x isn't in the set of prime numbers.
b) Prove or disprove the statement.
ok, if x is a prime number, then x only can be divided by himself. Now is easy to see that = x*x can be divided by himself and x, then x*x is not a prime number, because can be divided by another number different than himself
Answer:70 degrees and 150 degrees
Step-by-step explanation: The angles of a quadrilateral add up to 360. So the sum of the two angles is 360 - (55+ 85) = 220.
After that you can model the sum of the angles with an equation:
7x + 15x = 220
22x = 220
x = 10
then you plug in x for each angle 7(10) = 70 and 15(10) = 150
