1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
3 years ago
13

Who ruled the Indian subcontinent before the Mughals?​

History
2 answers:
Komok [63]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the mughals did

Explanation:

Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It began after the stock market crash of October 1929, which sent Wall Street into a panic and wiped out millions of investors. Over the next several years, consumer spending and investment dropped, causing steep declines in industrial output and employment as failing companies laid off workers.

You might be interested in
The voting rights act of 196 5 band which of the following examples of voting restrictions​
Paraphin [41]

Answer:Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Definition, Summary & Significance - HISTORY  band

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why would European nations give away land to people willing to settle and work in their colonies? (4 points) a To support the sl
KiRa [710]

Answer:

b

Explanation:b to grow larger and more powerfull

4 0
3 years ago
What did progressives think needed to play a more active role in solving society’s problems?
diamong [38]

Answer:

the government

Explanation:

Progressives generally believed that industrialism and urbanization had created many social problems. Most agreed that the government should take a more active role in solving society's problems. Progressives belonged to both major political parties and usually were urban, educated middle-class Americans.

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the role of women during World War I affect the suffragist movement?
mel-nik [20]
<span>They didnt campain anymore for the right to vote and the began to contibute to the war by working in factories</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What is the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

the constitution limits individual rights

Explanation:

The significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment is that "the constitution limits individual rights."

This is because the Supreme Court's translation of the First Amendment in some cases or instances relinquishes individual freedoms in the presence of the need to maintain social order.

This is evident in the case of Schenck v. the United States in the year 1919

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What discovery opened up the area of the Willapa Hills and lower Olympic Mountains to logging?
    6·1 answer
  • What does Carson mean when she contrast nature’s time scale to the time scale of human change
    6·2 answers
  • What was the "cult of domesticity and what costs and benefits did it bring to middle-class women? To working-class women?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the lost state of franklin
    14·1 answer
  • Who wanted to create “city on the hill”
    9·2 answers
  • What two land battle sites
    14·2 answers
  • What effort was aimed at breaking the will of Southerners?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the responsibility of a human resources specialist? Maintaining positive relationships bet
    9·2 answers
  • A)What is ballot fatigue and why does it stop people from voting?
    12·1 answer
  • What was life like in europe after the fall of the roman empire but before the rise of feudlism
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!