All categories

3 years ago

BRAINLIEST!

Mathematics

2 answers:

fiasKO [112]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

galben [10]3 years ago

4 0

I think A and D. This is because they all have a missing number. If they mean variable more literally then only A

You might be interested in

Y + 2 = 5/3 (x+6) .....

Rom4ik [11]

Your answer would be y=5/3x+8

5 0

3 years ago

Joel and his two friends went to the movies. They each brought a medium popcorn. All together they spent $45. How much did each

grin007 [14]

3 boys = $45

÷3 ÷3

$15, if they brought their own popcorn, then it's lose information, it's just there to throw you off

( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡ )

7 0

4 years ago

snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Old Imperialism led to exploration of new trade routes, establishment of new settlements in new lands and ultimately led to establishment of Political rule in those lands. Under New Imperialism, Nations ruled smaller colonial areas.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help help help help hlep help help help helph elp

Orlov [11]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

step 2; misapplication of the distributive property

Step-by-step explanation:

To eliminate parentheses, the distributive property of multiplication over addition tells you the outside factor is applied to each of the terms inside. The second step should be ...

Step 2: (0.5)(4) +(0.5)(1.2x) +(0.5)(-3.1) = 2 +0.6x -1.55

Shane's mistake was that he added the factor to the first term, subtracted the factor from the coefficient of the second term, and added the factor to the third term. He was inconsistent even in his misapplication of the distributive property.

3 0

3 years ago

Calculus piecewise function.

Kipish [7]

Part A

The notation $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x)$ means that we're approaching x = 2 from the right hand side (aka positive side). This is known as a right hand limit.

So we could start at say x = 2.5 and get closer to 2 by getting to x = 2.4 then to x = 2.3 then 2.2, 2.1, 2.01, 2.001, etc

We don't actually arrive at x = 2 itself. We simply move closer and closer.

Since we're on the positive or right hand side of 2, this means we go with the rule involving x > 2

Therefore f(x) = (x/2) + 1

Plug in x = 2 to find that...

f(x) = (x/2) + 1

f(2) = (2/2) + 1

f(2) = 2

This shows $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) = 2$

Then for the left hand limit $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ , we'll involve x < 2 and we go for the first piece. So,

f(x) = 3-x

f(2) = 3-2

f(2) = 1

Therefore, $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x) = 1$

===============================================================

Part B

Because $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) \ne \lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ this means that the limit $\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)$ does not exist.

If you are a visual learner, check out the graph below of the piecewise function. Notice the gap or disconnect at x = 2. This can be thought of as two roads that are disconnected. There's no way for a car to go from one road to the other. Because of this disconnect, the limit doesn't exist at x = 2.

===============================================================

Part C

You'll follow the same type of steps shown in part A.

However, keep in mind that x = 4 is above x = 2, so we'll deal with x > 2 only.

So you'd only involve the second piece f(x) = (x/2) + 1

You should find that f(4) = 3, and that both left and right hand limits equal this value. The left and right hand limits approach the same y value. The limit does exist here. There are no gaps to worry about when x = 4.

===============================================================

Part D

As mentioned earlier, since $\lim_{x \to 4^{+}}f(x) = \lim_{x \to 4^{-}}f(x) = 3$ , this means the limit $\lim_{x \to 4}f(x)$ does exist and it's equal to 3.

As x gets closer and closer to 4, the y values are approaching 3. This applies to both directions.

4 0

2 years ago