1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
2 years ago
5

What was the most significant governmental action in the 1960s and 1970s to radically change the EMS situation?

Law
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]2 years ago
4 0

Several Medical and Law experts gathered together and debated the formation of a new half government half privatized department to assist the Fire Department and Police in the field faster than the hospital could. In fact back then even experts debated to make a law that drivers must yield to emergency vehicles. However that law didn't become official until 1996 when a Paramedic was struck and killed by another vehicle.

You might be interested in
What are the four characteristics of a nation state
Alla [95]

Answer:

sovereignty, land, population, and government.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.what is the wave-like thing that exist in association with a moving particle and that governs its properties
BaLLatris [955]

Both a wave and a particle description of light are possible. The dual character of light has been highlighted in particular by two investigations.

<h3>What is made up of  Light?</h3>

Photons are electromagnetic field bundles that contain a set amount of energy and are the building blocks of light. Photons can be counted or even individually measured with sensitive enough studies.

Both a particle and a wave can be used to describe light. The dual nature of light has been demonstrated through two tests in particular. The particles we refer to as "photons" when imagining light as being composed of them are small. A certain quantity of energy is carried by each photon, which has no mass.

Learn more about Light here:

brainly.com/question/15200315

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
2 years ago
What is the main role of the court of appeals in Georgia?
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

What kind of jurisdiction gives a court the power to review cases that have already been decided by another court?

Appellate jurisdiction

Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear an appeal and to revise, overturn, or uphold a previous court's decision. The Supreme Court is the final appellant court in the appeals process.

8 0
3 years ago
Read this statement.
elixir [45]

Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis

Explanation:

Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.

When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In debates leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, northern states argued that:  A. slaves should be able to buy their freed
    10·1 answer
  • Alcohol consumed in______ puts strain on the heart.
    12·1 answer
  • Hi i need to know wich of the following is a use of the fungi kingdom
    6·1 answer
  • Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
    14·2 answers
  • Question 9 of 10
    6·2 answers
  • I need help asap plz
    8·2 answers
  • Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
    12·1 answer
  • The different parts of the disaster management cycle generate different planning requirements. In a similar way, levels of plans
    7·1 answer
  • The national farmland protection program was designed to.
    10·1 answer
  • A driver with a false sense of confidence may drive, feeling that he or she is in total
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!