Answer:
"The Man in the Arena"
The title of the real speech was "Citizenship In A Republic."
Explanation:
"Citizenship In A Republic" was a speech presented by Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne, in Paris, France on April 23, 1910.
I decided to pick this text because of the title in this assignment. "The Man in the Arena" as a title evokes some emotions. Ordinarily, without reading the main speech, it shows that somebody is urging somebody to rise up to the occasion and remain faithful. It looks as if Theodore Roosevelt was given a particular title topic to deliver his speech on. But, he would have preferred an emotional title like "The Man in the Arena."
Going through his speech proper, you discover that he encouraged the men who were involved in building their French nation to continue to exert efforts, warning against benchwarming by those who comfortably sat on the fence.
Take a look at this. "The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
<span>The ‘Watching the World from the Riverbank’, is trying to send the readers or communicate through the readers by having them to know about the world and how reality runs in every society or in the world that we live in and by that, it is trying to focus on the rules of reality in which is the main focus in the story. The correct answer is letter b.</span>
<em>They provide us with both a snapshot and a background to the social and political histories of the analytical method, colouring and outlining it with reality. While this is of some academic interest, biography also creates a far more engaging and lively platform for historical interest.</em>
Answer:
The punishment for removing weight from the 'handicap bag' was so harsh because if anyone would remove weight then others, too, would want to remove weights from their handicap bag, which will make their society step back to the Dark Ages of competition.
Explanation:
Harrison Bergeron is a short story written by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. The story is about a dystopian society, where people are living in 2081 and all people are equal in society.
There is an agency named the United States Handicapper General, which puts a 'handicap bag' around the neck of people who are more smarter and wiser than others. It is done so that people may not feel inferior to anyone.
The bag weighs around forty-seven pounds and is tied around the neck of <em>handicap </em>people. The punishment to remove weight from <em>'handicap bag' </em>is severe because if anyone would remove the weight from their bags then others would likely do the same, which will bring chaos in the society. This chaos most likely will result in going back to the <em>Dark Ages </em>where people were not equal and competitive.
<u>Textual evidence</u>
<em>'“If I tried to get away with it,” said George, “then other people’d get away with it—
and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else...'</em>
