Answer:
Option D. purchase the shares of a Index fund.
Explanation:
The reason is that the index funds are itself a mutual fund investment and they follow preset rules which helps an ordinary investor to understand those rules easily. Furthermore, they are already a diversified investment, hence investing in the shares of mutual fund makes the investment risk diversified investment.
Answer:
Debit account receivable $2.4 million; Credit Ticket Revenue $2.4 million
Explanation:
Double entry is when a business records a debit and credit in relation to a transaction. Generally you debit the receiver and credit the giver.
In this instance sales of tickets were made by Denver Broncos of $2.4 million worth.
The sale involves receipt of cash, but it is preseason and customers have not yet received service so we debit accounts receivable for $2.4 million.
Revenue is made from the sale so we credit Ticket Revenue to recognise income made.
he operating expense recorded from uncollectible receivables can be called all of the following except c. bad receivables expense.
Customers' outstanding debts for goods or services they have received but haven't yet paid for are referred to as accounts receivable. For instance, the amount owing when clients buy things on credit is added to the accounts receivable. It is a debt incurred as a result of a commercial transaction.
The term "accounts receivable" describes the unpaid bills or cash that customers owe a business. The term describes accounts that a company is entitled to get since it has provided a good or service.
Receivables, also known as accounts receivable, are a company's line of credit that typically include terms that call for payments to be made within a somewhat short time frame. Usually, it varies from a few days to a fiscal or calendar year.
To know more about accounts receivable:
brainly.com/question/13166196
#SPJ4
Answer:
a) diluted earnings per share = 0
Explanation:
Diluted earnings per share (DEPS) is a recalculation of the basic EPS. The difference between DEPS and EPS is, EPS represents the current position of earnings per share. No changes in number shares and/or earnings in the future are incorporated in the basic EPS.
Whereas DEPS is a representation of not only the current position of earnings and shares but also includes the commitments an entity has already made whose occurrence may result in an increase/decrease in the amount of earnings and/or number of shares. For example, in the question Culver Company has issued 10-year convertible bonds which right now have no impact on basic EPS but if in the future these bond holders exercise their right of conversion, this would result in an increase in number of ordinary shares hence decreasing/diluting the basic EPS. The entities use DEPS to show shareholders the impact of such commitments on the basic EPS to improve their decision making.
So in 2017 none of the bonds were converted therefore no diluted earnings per share is calculated in 2017.
If all of the bonds were converted in 2017 the DEPS would have been calculated as follows:
The formula for calculating DEPS is as follows;
DEPS = (Net income + interest savings) ÷ number of ordinary shares + increase in ordinary shares as a result of conversion.
Tax savings as a result of conversion=$128400 ($2140000×6%). Because if bond holders convert into ordinary shares then Culver company will not have to pay them interest and hence the amount of interest is saved.
Increase in ordinary shares upon conversion= 29960 ($2140000÷$1000=2140 bonds. Each bond is convertible into 14 shares therefore, 2140×14=29960).
Now Lets calculate DEPS as follows;
DEPS = ($296000+$128400) ÷ 91000+29960
DEPS =$424400÷120960
DEPS = $3.5
Answer:
Sunk costs.
Explanation:
Sunk costs refers to historical funds spent or incurred that cannot be recovered. Such costs are considered irrelevant during decision making which impacts on the business's future as they present no influence on present or future prospects.
Example
ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, money that has been or will be paid regardless of the decision whether to proceed with the project is sunk costs.
