Answer:
The triangles can be congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
They are congruent if proven by SSS: 2 sides are clearly stated that they are congruent due to the marks they have.
The last side can be congruent if the diagonals are congruent in length by proving.
They can also be congeuent due to SAS because there is gonna be alternate interior angles due to the transversal.
Answer: The given logical equivalence is proved below.
Step-by-step explanation: We are given to use truth tables to show the following logical equivalence :
P ⇔ Q ≡ (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P)
We know that
two compound propositions are said to be logically equivalent if they have same corresponding truth values in the truth table.
The truth table is as follows :
P Q ∼P ∼Q P⇔ Q ∼P ∨ Q ∼Q ∨ P (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P)
T T F F T T T T
T F F T F F T F
F T T F F T F F
F F T T T T T T
Since the corresponding truth vales for P ⇔ Q and (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P) are same, so the given propositions are logically equivalent.
Thus, P ⇔ Q ≡ (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P).
Answer:
Write the new equation in slope-intercept form. Replace the old slope with the new slope. Replace the y-intercept's value with a variable (b).
Answer:
-4
Step-by-step explanation:
1-5=-4 (7.1+1)-5=3.1
That's the beginning of Euler's number ' e '.
It falls between the square roots of 7 and 8 .
Hey ! You know what !
It falls between the square roots of any integer
less than 8 and any integer greater than 7 .