Each loop is of a different size, so we can't rotate the figure some angle x to have it line up with itself (0 < x < 360). Therefore, it doesn't have any rotational symmetry. That rules out choice A and choice C. Point symmetry is the same as saying "rotational symmetry of 180 degrees"
The figure doesn't have any line symmetry either. There is no line we can draw and reflect the figure over to have it match up with itself. That rules out choice B and points to choice D
Answer: D) It has no reflectional symmetry.
Answer:
cosθ = -√(35/36)
tanθ = -1/√35
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that
sin²θ + cos²θ = 1
(1/6)² + cos²θ = 1
1 - (1/6)² = cos²θ
35/36 = cos²θ
sec θ = 1/ cosθ
1/ secθ = cos θ
Because secθ < 0, 1/ secθ would also be < 0, so cos θ < 0
cosθ = -√(35/36)
tanθ = sinθ/cosθ = (1/6)/-√(35/36)
= (1/6) / -(√35/6)
= -1/√35
The horizontal component can be calculated using:
500cos(15)
= 483.0 meters
The answer is A.
Just by looking at it, 2 seems to be the correct answer. I mean if you think about it, when the triangle is split in two smaller triangles, side LN is longer than LP so that means x needs to be a small number. I could either be 2 or 1. Well if you look at the big picture, side LM is longer than LN so it’s gonna need to be bigger. If you say x=1 then you are saying 2(1) +4 = 6 (therefore LM is 6) but if you say x=2 then you are saying 2(2) +4 = 8 which makes more sense
If x=2 then you can use the Pythagorean’s theorem
a2 + b2 = c2
4^2 + b^2 = 5^2
16 + b^2 = 25
25-16= 9
b^2= 9
b= 3
Now that we know what NP is we can do Pythagorean’s theorem to figure out what side LP is (we already know it but you can do it again to check lol)
So the answer is 2
