Although E. coli may have translated it correctly, it might not have the same enzymatic<span> modification process present in the original organism where the genetic sequence was taken from. It might be worth trying this enzymatic modification, also called p</span><span>ost-translational modification - it is done in order to make some changes to the produced protein (such as introducing a phosphate group) making it functional.</span>
Both b and c, BB being both homozygous for brown eyes, and Bb being heterozygous being B= brown / b= blue & since Brown eyes are dominate over blue eyes it would certainly have a much higher percentage (75%/100%) of having brown eyes rather than blue eyes
Answer: Prokaryotes, archaea, protists, fungi, algae.
Explanation:I don’t think there are any single celled organisms that are today classified as animals. So basically I just left the animal kingdom out. Both metazoans and sponges are for the most part multicellular.
Having one theory is setting a limit on your potential and the potential of the overall theory and subject you are working on. Having multiple theories gives you a broader idea and perspective of what is going on, and even though one may slightly contradict the other, it is okay because that is what theories are for.
To the point, scientists usually have more than one theory so that they can gain a broader perspective on the matter and maybe even increase the chance of being correct on the matter.
Hope this was helpful.
Cheers,
