Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
English please not everyone can understand?!
They were glad for the additional settlements between themselves and Spanish Florida as some viewed as a potential threat.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Banks failed—between a third and half of all U.S. financial institutions collapsed, wiping out the lifetime savings of millions of Americans. The familiar narrative of the Great Depression places banks among the institutions that suffered fallout from the crisis.
Explanation:
<span>King Leopold II<span> of Belgium personally owned an area known as the Congo.</span><span> He turned over control in 1908 to the Belgian government.</span><span> The area became known as the Belgian Congo. so In other words the answer is C.
</span></span>
