Answer:
19.07%
Explanation:
The computation of the total compound return over the 3 years is shown below:
= (1 + investment percentage earned in first year) × (1 + investment percentage earned in second year) × (1 + investment percentage loss in second year)
= (1 + 0.35) × (1 + 0.40) × (1 - 0.37)
= 1.35 × 1.40 × 0.63
= 1.1907
= 19.07%
Answer:
a. H0 : U ≥ 15
Ha : U < 15
b. Type I error is incorrectly conclude that the pain is reduced in less than 15 minutes.
c. Type II error is fail to conclude that time for pain reduction is less than 15 mints when actually its less than 15 minutes.
Explanation:
Null hypothesis is a statement that is to be tested against the alternative hypothesis and then decision is taken whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
Type I error is one in which we reject a true null hypothesis.
Type II error is one in which we fail to reject the null hypothesis that is actually false.
Answer:
correct option is C. it's a good time to buy the wood.
Explanation:
given data
slab = 10 feet
cost Tee Time = $5,000
$500 US dollars = $738 NZ dollars
solution
If they import timber from New Zealand. Tea Golf Resort pays less than $ 5000 to import Wood from New Zealand at the current exchange rate. This is a good time for them to import forests
we get here current exchange rate of 1 dollar that is as
US $500 = NZ $738
so $1 = 
$1 = NZ $1.476
current exchange rate is $1 = NZ $1.476
so
10 foot slab costs $5000
so Tee Golf Resort will pay is
Tee Golf Resort pay = 
Tee Golf Resort pay = $3387.53
so correct option is C. it's a good time to buy the wood.
Answer:
The break even units of clock is 370 units.
Explanation:
Juniper Enterprises sells handmade clocks.
The variable cost per clock is $6.
The price of per unit of clock is $24.
The contribution margin per unit
= Sales - Variable cost
= $24 - $6
= $18
Break even units
= 
= 
= 370 units
I believe, this programmed decision could best be described by: Classical Model.
In the classical model of decision making, we based the decision on something that is the most logical and rational.
This model commonly provide the most objective solution but often fail to see how emotions and relationship between members could influence the decisions.
