Answer:
13.16%
Explanation:
In this question we use the RATE formula i.e shown in the attached spreadsheet
Given that,
Present value = $725
Assuming figure - Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 9% ÷ 2 = $45
NPER = 16 years × 2 = 32 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the yield to maturity is 6.58% × 2 = 13.16%
Answer:
The answer is: Extended problem solving
Explanation:
Extended problem solving involves an elaborate decision-making process in which a consumer (Lexi) will try to get as much information as possible on all her available options (possible gifts) and then decide which option (gift) will . be better.
Consumer usually take this approach on issues they consider very important and of high risk. Lexi knows her sister´s graduation is important and doesn´t want to look bad.
Answer:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
Explanation:
The closeness to the next airport and railway station, all possible benefits of a location, prices as well as brand value of the location are required to choose the ideal company location.
Choosing SEZ's truly trade community is the best way to do the company because it offers availability and accessibility to the airport as well as all business centers.
Quality management where quality improvement is indeed the primary requirement and the best quality is measured. To improve quality overall, one must embrace it.
Its error rate is the minimum and the result is of the greatest durability, sturdiness, and value perception. Complete such as Agile, Kaizen, supply chain, and inventory control are available.
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
