Answer: The Federalist Papers
Explanation: the federalist papers written under the pseudonym *Publius* were a series of articles and essay by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The papers were written in an atempt to sway publiv opinion and persuade voters towards ratification of the Constitution. It was commonly referred to as the Federalist and became the Federalist Papers in the 20th century.
The Federalist Papers are still relevant till date as federal judges refer to it in the interpretation of the Constitution. They are used to clarify and simplify what the framers of the Constitution intended. Their importance can be seen in how much they are referred to when making decisions; as at year 2000, The Federalist Papers had been quoted 291 times in Supreme Court decisions.
Or the first question it is B and for the second question it is D and for the 3rd question it is A
Answer:
D. polychronic culture.
Explanation:
Carlos is from a polychronic culture because he does multiple things at the same time. We can see that on his way to a meeting, he is running errands. That is to say, Carlos is using s specific time for various activities. If Carlos were from a monochronic culture, he would run his errands after or before the meeting. Besides, his trip to the office will be without any stops in other places because he would be dedicating a specific time to every activity he does.
In a high context culture, the communication is mostly implicit. There is a lot of information that the listener takes from voice tone, movements, and expressions. The person has to interpret the message.
In a low context culture, the communication is explicit and very clear. The listener does not have to interpret the message. It is not related to the context as in high context culture, what the speaker said with the focus on the meaning of every word in the message is what he/she meant.
Effective democracies tend to allow a broader range of interests to be considered on a regular basis. This leads to more nuanced and moderate policies and reduces the risk that ineffective leaders can stay in power for a long time.
These characteristics encourage more robust and stable economic growth.
In authoritarian systems, economic growth is more likely to be narrowly based on a small section of the population and corruption is likely to be higher.
Few countries with authoritarian systems of government have achieved high levels of growth in the long term.
Hope this helps!
The ~unequal~ statuses of different individuals in a society. for example, a doctor has a higher social status than a janitor working at the same hospital. the doctor might be awarded for his work, while the janitor is mostly ignored. the doctor may also have come from a fairly wealthy family and received a good education, while the janitor may have had economic disadvantages and a poor quality education. so the doctor and the janitor are socially unequal. social inequality is very closely connected to economic inequality, so if you ever see the phrase "socio-economic inequality," that's why.
