The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Answer:
The three primary stakeholders are the banks, the merchants, and the consumers.
Banks = Against, since this would mean that they will be receiving less
Merchants = For, since they would be paying less
Consumers = Generally unaffected. But I believe they would be more against the proposal because if interchange fees are capped, then the banks will find other ways to retrieve the lost revenues by other means, such as increasing the interest or etc.
Oh who that
well Congrat to the person
how you doing?
how was your day?
Explanation:
Can you give me the website to see it?
The members of the court and household attend to the king in the mornings <span>well the king, finnace concil and the cardinals. I hope the answer will help you.
Thank you for posting your questions here at brainly </span>
<span>1. </span>I
believe the correct answer is the art of discourse.
Rhetoric is the art of discourse, the effective or
persuasive speaking or writing, which puts an emphasis on learning exploitation
of figures of speech and other compositional techniques. The founder of rhetoric
is Greek philosopher Aristotle, who considered rhetoric to be a counterpart of
both logic and politics. He defined rhetoric as: "the faculty of observing
in any given case the available means of persuasion.”
<span>2. </span>I
believe the correct answer is Greece.
<span>The term rhetoric has
its origins in Greek peninsula and it was derived from the Greek "rhetorike techne" meaning the "art of an
orator". This phrase comes from the word rhetor (speaker, orator, teacher
of rhetoric) which is related to the word rhesis (speech). </span>