People, events, and ideas all impact one another in a literary text. The same may be said for an informational text. All of the pieces work together to support and explain the text's principal point.
Analyzing the many links and interactions between people, events, and ideas can help readers better grasp what they read.
This enables readers to draw crucial inferences about a book, such as how a particular incident impacts an individual or how one person's concept might influence others.
<h3>What is a textual interaction?</h3>
This is simply defined as the way things affect one another.
<h3>What is a transition?</h3>
When a word or a phrase connects one idea to another it is called a transition word or phrase. Transitions are crucial when analyzing text interaction because, they are the "door" that lead from one idea into another.
Learn more about interactions between ideas and individuals in a text:
brainly.com/question/24353040
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation: an- a
Nome Alaska- Nome, Alaska
wasnt- wasn't
Travel- Traveling by air
life-saveing- saving
balto- Balto
a husky named balto- a husky named balto,
threw- through
return- returned
was all most- was about
Answer:
am not sure but the one that makes most sense is option D (will be)
The most logical answer would be A.
"The author states that animals and humans share 98 percent DNA." The author is explaining the genetics of animals and humans. please correct me if i'm wrong!!
Answer:
"Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished Rainsford stiffly.
"But they are men," said Rainsford hotly.
Explanation:
These sentences were said by Rainsford when he found out that Zaroff took pleasure in killing men for fun. Zaroff believes that this is just a different type of hunting, and that men are the most interesting prey. However, Rainsford argues that men are not meant to be killed. In the first sentence, he refers to this as "cold-blooded murder," while in the second sentence he argues that they are men, and therefore, should not be hunted. The fact that he condemns this action shows that he was also not justified in killing Zaroff.