1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case

Law
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a

Explanation: it makes sense

You might be interested in
Significado de política. que es?
Vlad [161]
Política es ciencia que se trata del gobierno y la organización de sociedades humanas especialmente de los estados.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the Second Amendment and the year it was ratified?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

the right to bear arms and in 1791 by the U.S. congress

3 0
3 years ago
Which weakness of the Articles of Confederation was corrected by the authors of the Constitution?
Elden [556K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The defendant planned to break into a home, steal any valuables that he could easily pawn, and then burn down the home using gas
DaniilM [7]

In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.

<h3>What is Burglary and larceny?</h3>

Burglary is known to be the act of entering a building with the intention to carry out a crime.

Larceny is known too be a theft, and one do not need a structure or building for it.

Therefore, In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.

Learn more about defendant  from

brainly.com/question/1259392

#SPJ12

7 0
2 years ago
which of the following terms represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk t
enyata [817]

Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.

A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.

Learn more about Proximate cause, here

brainly.com/question/13885854

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A state legislator wants to amend the Articles of Confederation. How many states would have to agree in order for the amendment
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What are the three parts of the executive branch?
    9·2 answers
  • Use your understanding of the policy process to put head steps in order.
    8·1 answer
  • __________ is the name given to the written decision of a case that has been agreed to by more than half of the supreme court.
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the author of the classical theory?
    10·2 answers
  • What are some of the things that harriet tubman is known for
    6·1 answer
  • Why might the government not want to give lawyers to every single person accused of any
    10·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the reparations Germany paid at the end of World War I. Why do you think the
    7·1 answer
  • What is one of the main differences between a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA? A. They differ in the amount you can contribute at
    12·2 answers
  • Insurance is the transfer of what
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!