To solve this problem you must apply the proccedure shown below:
1. You must apply the Law of Cosines, as you can see in the figure attached. Then:
- The first ship travels at 
in for two hours. Therefore, the side 
is:
- The second ship travels at 
for 
. Therefore, the side 
is:
- Now, you can calculate 
:
The answer is: 
Answer:
(0, -6)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following systems of linear equations;
3x - 2y = 12 ...... equation 1
16x - 4y = 24 ........ equation 2
We would solve for the solution using the elimination method;
Multiplying eqn 1 by 2, we have;
2 * (3x - 2y = 12)
6x - 4y = 24
16x - 4y = 24
Subtracting the two equations, we have;
(6x - 16x) + (-4y -[-4y]) = (24 - 24)
-10x - 0 = 0
-10x = 0
x = -0/10 = 0
Next, we would find the value of y;
3x - 2y = 12
3(0) - 2y = 12
0 - 2y = 12
-2y = 12
y = -12/2
y = -6
Check:
3x - 2y = 12
3(0) - 2(-6) = 12
0 - (-12) = 12
12 = 12
Note: the options provided for this questions are incorrect or inappropriate.
Answer:
Can't be determined
Step-by-step explanation:
You just don't have enough info!
The purpose of the tensor-on-tensor regression, which we examine, is to relate tensor responses to tensor covariates with a low Tucker rank parameter tensor/matrix without being aware of its intrinsic rank beforehand.
By examining the impact of rank over-parameterization, we suggest the Riemannian Gradient Descent (RGD) and Riemannian Gauss-Newton (RGN) methods to address the problem of unknown rank. By demonstrating that RGD and RGN, respectively, converge linearly and quadratically to a statistically optimal estimate in both rank correctly-parameterized and over-parameterized scenarios, we offer the first convergence guarantee for the generic tensor-on-tensor regression. According to our theory, Riemannian optimization techniques automatically adjust to over-parameterization without requiring implementation changes.
Learn more about tensor-on-tensor here
brainly.com/question/16382372
#SPJ4
Answer:
Same-side exterior angles
Step-by-step explanation:
Through the process of elimination it is not:
→ Corresponding angles as that would be 2 and 6
→ Same side interior angles as that would be 3 and 6 or 4 and 5
→ Alternate interior angles as that would be 6 and 4 of 3 and 5
