Answer:
The Department of Interior
Explanation:
The false statement here is :
b.
Secessionists in Texas often intimidated Unionists into not voting against secession.
Explanation:
Although Texas was at the forefront of the movement of Secession it had not grown so far as to become violent for the people who did not believe in it yet.
A sizable number of people in Texas were in favor of the union and remained so for the long duration of the war.
During the Act and the Convention this faction was led by the Governor of the state himself so there was no possibility of a complete rebellion that would make such cases of violence possible.
The correct answer is Keynes.
Keynes supported free markets but as long as these were regulated by state intervention in order to soften the peaks and troughs in the business cycle. Therefore, in his opinion, the three economic questions (what to produce, how and for whom) should be answered by the economic agents in the markets, but always under the supervision of the state.
Smith was an advocate of free markets and of supressing state interventionism. On the other hand, Marx was in favour of massive intervention of the state because he considered markets to produce un unfair distribution of wealth in the states, where the richer ones exploited the poor.
The difference was that the Virginia Plan favored bigger states and the New Jersey plan favored smaller states. Later one the Great Compromise was made using petitions of both of this plans.
Not sure about statements but the separation of powers is meant to keep one branch of government from becoming too powerful. It gives each branch powers the others don't have. This balances out the government.
