Answer: Arguing from causation
Explanation:
Arguing from causation is an arguement which has a casual statement concluding it. Laura argues from causation.
Answer:
Losing telephone privileges for breaking curfew
Explanation:
Punishment by removal is also called Negative removal. It involves the removal of a good and very pleasant stimulus after a repulsive or displeasing behavior has been exhibited. The aim of the punishment is to reduce such behavior. The punishment is usually meted out to children in a bid to correct them knowing fully well if they exhibit such behavior again then such privileges will be taken away from them.
<em>Sorry but I don't get the problem. Here are some guesses on what you mean. </em>
- <em>The points are for the family's. </em>
- <em>You wanna let people know that others have a hard time to.</em>
- <em>That this is a serious case and we should care.</em>
- <em>We are lazy.</em>
- <em>We don't have a hard life like some people out there. </em>
- <em>We should care about these people.</em>
- <em>We should help these people. </em>
If statements are already provided, they should give you a gist such as:
"A non-renewable resource is a resource that can only be consumed but not produced"
"A non-renewable resource, such as coal, cannot be used more than once, unlike wind power"
"A non-renewable resource is a resource that must expel an unusable waste"
Perspective, I hope thus helped with your studies ;)
