Answer: $320
Explanation:
The Profit as the question shows is the Total Revenue less the total cost.
Total Revenue.
This will be the amount of goods sold multiplied by the price they are sold at.
The monopolist maximises output where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost which from the graph is 4 units.
The price they sell at is the intersection of this quantity with the demand curve which is at $120.
Total Revenue = Units Sold * Price
= 4 * 120
= $480
Total Cost
The total cost will be the average cost per unit multiplied by the number of units sold. The relevant average cost is the cost associated with the maximised out of 4 units which according to the graph is $40.
= Average cost * number of units
= 40 * 4
= $160
Profit = 480 - 160
= $320
Answer:
B) Implement policies to encourage greater consumption.
Explanation:
The Paradox of thrift says that an increase in autonomous saving leads to a decrease in aggregate demand and thus a decrease in gross output which will, in turn, lower total saving due to that total saving may fall because of individuals' attempts to increase their saving, Therefore, to avoid the paradox of thrift policies to encourage consumption must be implemented.
Answer:
Product cost per unit = $13
Explanation:
<em>Absorption costing values units of inventory and production using full cost per unit. Full cost per unit includes variable cost and a portion of fixed production overheads. The fixed production overhead are charged to cost units using predetermined overhead absorption rate.</em>
The full cost per unit = D.mat cost + D.labour cost + Variable overheads+ Fixed overheads.
Total full absorption cost = 125,000 + 100,000 + 75,000 + 25,000=325,000
Full cost per unit = Total full absorption cost/Number of units
= 325,000/25,000 =$13
<em>Note that we excluded non- production cost like selling and administrative from the computation because they are not related to production</em>
Product cost per unit = $13
Answer:
B. The lender would benefit.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the one who would benefit from a lower inflation rate would be the lender. That is because by there being a lower inflation rate it means that the money that the borrower needs to pay back the loan does not have the buying power he predicted it would have when he borrowed it. Meaning that he would need to pay more money to the lender than originally anticipated.
Financial venture. even his wife was supportive. albert liked a number of riskier company
