1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svet_ta [14]
3 years ago
14

Statement: "Whenever a company’s activities reduce the quality of life for nearby homeowners, the company should be legally requ

ired to pay each homeowner a fee to fairly compensate for the reduction in that home is financial value resulting from those activities." Proposed Assumption: Unless legally required to do so, no company will pay compensation for reductions in the values of nearby homes caused by the company’s activities.1. assumption made2. assumption not made
Business
1 answer:
olganol [36]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

2) assumption not made

Explanation:

The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.

maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.

You might be interested in
Assume MU_c and Mu_d represent the marginal utility that a consumer gets from products C and D, the respective prices of which a
lana [24]

Answer:

<h2>The correct answer in this case is option C. or MU(c)/P(c)>MU(d)/P(d).</h2>

Explanation:

Under consumer equilibrium theory for two commodity model,a rational consumer maximizes his or her utility when the marginal utility(MU) obtained from consuming one good is equal to the same of the other.This is the fundamental essence of the Law of Equimarginal Utility in Economics.Now,in this case,the consumer will purchase more of good C than good D if the Marginal utility obtained from one unit of good C or MU(c)  for the money spend on consumption of good C or price of C,P(c) is greater than the marginal utility obtained from consuming 1 more unit of good D or MU(d) for money spend on purchase of good D or price of that particular unit of D or P(d).Therefore,since the marginal satisfaction compared to the amount of money spend for the consumer is higher for good C compared to the other or good D,it will increase the total utility level of the consumer from that particular consumption bundle or pattern.Hence,he or she will spend more on the consumption of good C than good D.

8 0
2 years ago
Capital controls may take a variety of forms​ EXCEPT: A. prohibitions B. currency boards C. taxes D. quotas
LekaFEV [45]

Answer: B. Currency Boards

Explanation: Capital control is a process through which Organisations put in place different actions and programs to regulate the capital used in the business. This can be in the form of prohibitions(a capital control by preventing certain spending)

Taxes are also means of controlling capital by Organisations.

Quotas are also used to control capital by assigning certain level of spending or investment.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Exercise 7-4A Effect of recognizing uncollectible accounts expense on financial statements: Percent of revenue allowance method
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Rosie Dry Cleaning

a. Organization of the transaction data in accounts under an accounting equation:

Year 1:

The accounting equation is Assets = Liabilities + Equity.

1) Provided $29,940 of cleaning services on account.

Assets (Accounts Receivable) increases by $29,940; Equity (Retained Earnings) increases by $29,940.  So, Assets + $29,940 = Liabilities + Equity + $29,940.

2) Collected $23,952 cash from accounts receivable.

Assets (Cash) increases by $23,952 and Assets (Accounts Receivable) decreases by $23,952.  So, Assets + $23,952 and - $23,952 = Liabilities + Equity.

3) Adjusted the accounting records to reflect the estimate that uncollectible accounts expense would be 1 percent of the cleaning revenue on account.

Assets (Accounts Receivable) reduces by $59.88 and Equity (Retained Earnings) reduces by $59.88.  So, Assets - $59.88 = Liabilities + Equity - $59.88.

Year 2:

1. Wrote off a $225 account receivable that was determined to be uncollectible.

Assets (Accounts Receivable) decreases by $225 and Equity (Retained Earnings) decreases by $225.  So, Assets - $225 = Liabilities + Equity - $225.

2. Provided $34,940 of cleaning services on account.

Assets (Accounts Receivable) increases by $34,940 and Equity (Retained Earnings) increases by $34,940.  So, Assets + $34,940 = Liabilities + Equity + $34,940.

3. Collected $30,922 cash from accounts receivable.

Assets (Cash) increases by $30,922 and Assets (Accounts Receivable) decreases by $30,922.  So, Assets + $30,922 - $30,922 = Liabilities + Equity.

4. Adjusted the accounting records to reflect the estimate that uncollectible accounts expense would be 1 percent of the cleaning revenue on account.

Assets (Accounts Receivable) decreases by $37.93 ($97.81 - $59.88) and Equity (Retained Earnings) decreases by $37.93.  So, Assets - $37.93 = Liabilities + Equity - $37.93.

b. 1) Net Income for Year 1:

Sales = $29,940

less Allowance for uncollectible = $59.88)

Total = $29,880.12

2) Net Cash Flows from operating activities for Year 1 = $23,952.

3) Balance of Accounts Receivable at the end of Year 1:

Sales = $29,940

Less Cash Receipt = $23,952

Balance = $5,988

4) Net Realizable value of accounts receivable at the end of Year 1.

Accounts Balance = $5,988

less Allowance for Uncollectible = $59.88

Net Realizable = $5,928.12

c 1) Net Income for Year 1:

Sales = $34,940

less Bad Debts Expense = $262.93 ($37.93 + $225)

Total = $34,677.07

2) Net Cash Flows from operating activities for Year 1 = $30,922.

3) Balance of Accounts Receivable at the end of Year 1:

Beginning balance = $5,988

Sales = $34,940

Less Bad Debts Expense = $225

Less Cash Receipt = $30,922

Balance = $9,781

4) Net Realizable value of accounts receivable at the end of Year 1.

Accounts Balance = $9,781

less Allowance for Uncollectible = $97.81

Net Realizable = $9,683.19

Explanation:

The accounting equation states that Assets equal Liabilities plus Equity.  Any change in one side of the equation affects the other.  Sometimes, a transaction or event affects one side only by increasing one account and decreasing another account on the same side of the equation.  Examples are demonstrated in the answer above.

When an uncollectible is deemed bad, it reduces the Accounts Receivable and increases the bad debt expense.  The overall effect on the accounting equation is a reduction in Assets and Equity respectively.

8 0
3 years ago
If abc company earned $280,000 in net income and paid cash dividends of $40,000, what are abc's earnings per share if it has 80,
Nadya [2.5K]
<span>To find earnings per share, simply divide the company's net income by the number of shares that are outstanding. In this case, the values are $280,000/80,000. This gives a value of $3.50 for the earnings per share outstanding. Dividends, in this case, are not necessary for the calculation.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are arguments that are given to support trade barriers?
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

E To prevent dumping

Explanation:

There are several arguments that are given to support trade barriers; one of which is to prevent dumping. A country would place embargo on imports with respect to some of the goods that are produced in her country. This is to enable and encourage local production of such goods. Where a country permits importation of goods that are produced locally, such action could being down the efforts of local production ; hence local industries might not thrive in terms of production.

Also, placing embargo on the importation of goods that are produced locally in a country would take away the possibility of making the country for dumping ground in terms of goods that are not up to standard, produced in a foreign country and same would have been imported.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company projects an increase in net income of $30000 each year for the next five years if it invests $300000 in new equipment.
    7·1 answer
  • The conservatism constraint prescribes that:
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me ill give brainliest to anyone who does this right:3
    12·1 answer
  • Leslie Halverson is considering investing in the stock market. She wants to be sure to be able to get her money back whenever sh
    9·1 answer
  • Novak Corporation reported the following for 2020: net sales $1,208,000, cost of goods sold $731,100, selling and administrative
    13·1 answer
  • Linda, a manager at Addoso Inc., is writing a proposal on how a new work benefit will affect employees' attitude toward their jo
    6·2 answers
  • At January 1, Year 1, under its restricted stock unit (RSU) plan, Label Corporation grants RSUs representing 10,000 of its $1 pa
    13·1 answer
  • Incomplete manufacturing costs, expenses, and selling data for two different cases are as follows.
    6·1 answer
  • 3. You work for a small store called Home Grown Goods that sells organic snack foods and
    12·1 answer
  • Each property has unique features, whether it is its age, the building design of its structures, or its location. as such, real
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!