I really don’t know sorry bro
A. It is an experiment as the sales director is applying treatment ( the training ) to a group and recording the results.
B. I would have 250 sales representatives from each region take the training and 250 from each region to not take it so i can be able to see if it affects both regions differently. The representatives from each region would be chosen at random and the length of their training would be the same for all.
C. now you would only be able to have 200 people from each region train. this would lower the percentage of the impact the training had on the amount of sales ( if any) . For example, if the original 250 trained people in a region increased the sales in that region by 20 percent and 50 of those people ended up not actually training, the sales would have only increased by 16 percent.
D. correlational research is best to establish causality. for example, the amount of training the representatives got may affect how much they are able to sell. also the number of representatives trained may affect the amount sold
<span>Length of outer track = sum of length of 10 pieces = circumference of the outer circle
if R is the Radius of outer circle then...
Circumference of the outer track = 2pi*R
Similarly the circumference of the inner track (with radius r) = 2pi*r
length of each outer piece is 3.4 inch more than length of inner piece
So total outer length is 10*3.4 =34 inches more than the inner length.
=> Outer Circumference - Inner Circumference = 34 inches
=> 2pi*R - 2pi*r = 34
=> 2pi(R -r) = 34
=> R-r = 34/2pi = 5.41 inches
=> R-r = Width of the track = 5.41 inches</span>
Answer: b. 1/2.
Step-by-step explanation: 3/7 in decimal form is 0.42, which is close to 1/2 (0.5) than to 0.
