6(4.4) = 6 x 4.4 = 26.4
The one with the parenthesis would be the distributive property. I'm not 100% sure, though. Hope this helps.
No because if that happened they wouldn’t be able to do it again so yeah
I'm guessing you mean f(x)=15,000(9/8)^x. If this is what you mean, the population would increase by about 12,000 (12030.4870605 to be exact).
Step-by-step explanation:
Starting equation: f(x)=15,000(9/8)^x
You can clean up the 9/8 to be 1.125
Now what you want to do is find the answer to (9/8)^5 which is 1.8020324707
Next multiply 1.8020324707 by 15,000 and you get 27030.4870605
Finally 27,030.4870605 - 15,000 gives you 12030.4870605. Which means that the population increased by about 12,000.
Please mark me brainiest cuz I need one more to level up!! Thank you
Answer:
D) The manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario indicates the null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses are
Null hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners hasn't changed.
Alternative hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners has changed.
The null hypothesis is rejected if the calculated p-value is less significance level.
We are given that p-value is 0.0743 and confidence level=0.95.
Significance level =α=1-0.95=0.05.
As we can see the p-value is greater than significance level, so, we fail to reject the null hypotheses at 5% significance level.
Thus, we conclude at the 95% confidence level that the manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed
