Answer:
The answer is $91,000
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Net Operating Income as per Variable Costing = $93,400
Less: Fixed manufacturing overhead released from Inventory (2300*$1)= $2300
Net Operating Income as per Absorption costing = $91,000
Hence Net operating income in absorption costing is $ 91,000
The difference in Net operating Income which is under the variable costing technique & Absorption costing method is due to treatment of Fixed manufacturing overhead.
Difference can be reconcile using following below:
Criteria Operating Income higher in
Ending Inventory is higher than beginning Inventory Absorption costing
Ending Inventory is lesser than beginning Inventory Variable costing
So,
The inventory reduced by 2,300 units; implies that Ending inventory is lesser than Beginning Inventory, the Net operating income higher in Variable costing.
Answer:
The correct option is B
Explanation:
The value chain activities are those activities which the firm or business perform or completes so that can produce the products and then ultimately sells them, distribute and service the products in order to create or establish the value of the product from customers.
In other words, it is bringing a product from making to distribution, and everything in between like procuring raw materials, manufacturing functions, and the marketing activities.
Answer:
November 1, 2016
Dr Cash 120,000
Cr Notes Payable 120,000
December 31, 2016
Dr Interest Expense 2,000
Cr Interest Payable 2,000
February 1, 2017
Dr Notes Payable 120,000
Dr Interest Payable 2,000
Dr Interest Expense 1,000
Cr Cash 123,000
Explanation:
Dunlin Development Company Journal entries
November 1, 2016
Dr Cash 120,000
Cr Notes Payable 120,000
December 31, 2016
Dr Interest Expense 2,000
($120,000 ×10% ×2/12)
Cr Interest Payable 2,000
February 1, 2017
Dr Notes Payable 120,000
Dr Interest Payable 2,000
Dr Interest Expense 1,000
(120,000×10%×1/12)
Cr Cash 123,000
Answer:
decrease the bid price in the OTCBB
Explanation:
Given that, the dealer's Bid price is too high, this is believed to be the reason behind the sellers trying to make orders. Hence, to reduce the orders, the dealer will lower the Bid price.
Hence, in this case, the best answer or alternative to be considered is that, the dealer would most likely decrease the bid price in the OTCBB, this is specifically to discourage the sellers.
Answer:
The Question has been offered as to pick the least of the terms less expensive than lifetime alternative, so it is smarter to continue with the choices given in the Question.
For 14 years:
Year Cash Flow PVF = 7.6% Cash Flow
0 $800 1 $800
1 - 13 $800 8.0807 $6464.56
<u>Total $7264.56
</u>
For 13 years
:
Year Cash Flow PVF = 7.6% Cash Flow
0 $800 1 $800
1 - 12 $800 7.6948 $6155.83
<u>Total $6955.835
</u>
<u>
</u>For 19 years
Year Cash Flow PVF = 7.6% Cash Flow
0 $800 1 $800
1 - 18 $800 9.6377 $7710.16
<u>Total $8510.16
</u>
<u>
</u>
For the long time alternative it is realize that not doable choice to go with 19 years so obviously past 19 years likewise not possible so for a long time not comprehended.
from the over the least is accessible in 13 years so lloyd needs to go for a long time.