1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
netineya [11]
3 years ago
14

Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal tax would be $1,500, bu

t government officials have set the tax at $500. At the equilibrium with the $500 tax: a. there will be too much pollution. b. the marginal social cost of pollution will be less than $500. c. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be less than $500. d. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be more than $500.
Business
1 answer:
Mariulka [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: there will be too much pollution

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution and that the optimal tax should have been $1,500 but government officials have set the tax equal to $500.

It should be noted that due to the fact that the optimal tax has been set below the equilibrium, this will lead to a rise in pollution as the people will be aware that they're paying less than the optimal level which will lead to more pollution. An increase in the optimal tax will have help in reducing the pollution.

You might be interested in
Owner made no investments in the business, and no dividends were paid during the year. Owner made no investments in the business
lyudmila [28]

Answer:

A corporation had the following assets and liabilities at the beginning and end of this year.

                                                     Assets             Liabilities

Beginning of the year             $ 76,500             $ 32,796

End of the year                           132,000               53,460

    Details                                                a           b        c       d

1 Beginning of the year Equity    43,704      43,704    43,704     43,704

2 Owner's investment (+)                 -         -           45,000      35,000

3 Dividends (-)                                 -          10,200        -     10,200

4 Net income / loss (+)               34836     45,036     -10164       10,036

5 End of the year Equity          78540      78540      78540      78540

Explanation:

Equity = Assets - Liability

Beginning of the year = 76500 - 32796 = $43,704

End of the year = 132000 - 53460 = 78540

Net income = End of year equity -  (Beginning of the year Equity + Owner's Investment - Dividends)

a) Net income = 5 -  (1 + 2 - 3)

                   = 78540 - (43704  + 0 - 0)

                   = 34,836

b) Dividend of 850 per month = 850 * 12 = 10,200

Net income = 5 -  (1 + 2 - 3)

                   = 78540 - (43704  + 0 - 10200)

                   = 45,036

c) Net Income = 5 -  (1 + 2 - 3)

                       = 78540 - (43704  + 45000 - 0)

                       = -10,164

d) Dividend of 850 per month = 850 * 12 = 10,200

Net Income = 5 -  (1 + 2 - 3)

                     = 78540 - (43704  + 35000 - 10200)

                       = 10,036

Owner's investment increases equity

Dividends reduce equity

Net Income increases equity

6 0
3 years ago
Baskets Inc. gathered the following actual results for the current month: Actual amounts: ​ Units produced 6000​ Direct material
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

price variance  $(22,800.00) UNFAVORABLE

Explanation:

(standard\:cost-actual\:cost) \times actual \: quantity= DM \: price \: variance

std cost                           $6.00

actual cost                    $9.00

quantity                       7,600

difference                   $(3.00)

price variance  $(22,800.00)

We calculate the actual cost by dividing total cost by the lbs purchased:

68,400/7,600 = 9

Because the diference is negative, the variance is unfavorable.

Each pound cost more than it was planned.

8 0
3 years ago
Kaspar Corporation makes a commercial-grade cooking griddle. The following information is available for Kaspar Corporation's ant
Leto [7]

Answer:

Total cost per unit is $77

Explanation:

Fixed manufacturing overhead per unit = Total fixed manufacturing overhead ÷ Number of units

= $478,800 ÷ 34,200 = $14 per unit

Fixed selling and administrative expenses per unit = Total Fixed selling and administrative expenses ÷ Number of units

= $171,000 ÷ 34,200 = $5 per unit.

Total cost per unit = Direct material + Direct labor + Variable manufacturing overhead + Fixed manufacturing overhead + Variable selling expenses + Fixed selling expenses

Total cost per unit = $15 + $5 + $11 + $14 + $5 + $5 = $55 per unit.

Markup = 40% of total cost = $55 × 40% = $22

Therefore, total selling price per unit = Cost per unit + Markup

= $55 + $22 = $77 per unit.

7 0
3 years ago
In setting a product's , a business needs to take into account the costs of producing, distributing, and promoting the product a
Illusion [34]

When setting the price of a product, a company needs to take into account the costs of producing, distributing and promoting the product, as well as a profit margin.

<h3>How to set the product price correctly?</h3>

It is essential that the company align its needs and objectives with the characteristics of the market and its business, in order to define a compatible and competitive price. It is essential to analyze income and expenses to establish an optimal balance in the pricing process, revising the strategy whenever necessary.

Therefore, it is essential that pricing is aligned to the market, to the fixed and variable costs of the business, considering its needs and goals for the business to be well positioned in the market.

Find out more about pricing here:

brainly.com/question/7452044

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Using the trueblood criterion what is the ultimate goal of accounting?
vampirchik [111]

The ultimate goal of accounting according to trueblood criterion is to predict future cash flows to the investor or creditor

<h3>What is a trueblood criterion?</h3>

In accounting, its means the reporting on the past & present firm information that could help us predict future cash flow to firm.

Hence, by virtue of trueblood criterion, the ultimate goal of accounting is to predict future cash flows to the investor or creditor.

Therefore, the Option C is correct

Missing options "A) Predict future cash flows to the firm

B) Predict income to the investor or creditor

C) Predict future cash flows to the investor or creditor

D) Predict income to the firm"

Read more about accounting

brainly.com/question/26690519

#SPJ11

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose the demand function​ (D) for golf clubs​ is: Qequals150minus1.00​P, where P is the price paid by consumers in dollars pe
    15·1 answer
  • List several factors that help identify inappropriate, unsound, and possibly dangerous commercial weight loss programs
    10·1 answer
  • Real-world economies get hit with lots of shocks to aggregate demand and real shocks. Categorize each scenario as an aggregate d
    6·1 answer
  • If retention is so much more profitable than acquisition, why have companies persisted for so long in spending more on getting n
    6·1 answer
  • Financial literacy refers to:
    8·1 answer
  • Bonnie's employer provides her with an annual dinner club membership costing $5,000. Her marginal tax rate is 24 percent. Her em
    13·1 answer
  • Currie Company borrowed $30,000 from the Sierra Bank by issuing a 9% three-year note. Currie agreed to repay the principal and i
    11·1 answer
  • Betty made a 20% profit on a residential lot she sold for $30,000. What did she pay for the property
    9·1 answer
  • Gullett Corporation had $34,000 of raw materials on hand on November 1. During the month, the Corporation purchased an additiona
    15·1 answer
  • Explain five reasons some areas have high population density and give example of those areas​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!