Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Answer:
analysis and proof of morality
Answer:
Egyptians
Explanation:
They created scarecrows to scare the birds away so it is just basically a humanoid with clothes on scaring away birds from crops.
The Mexican society wasn't united, since they were constantly fighting with each other. Since soldiers were killed, they also lost military power. When the Spanish arrived, they had a strong military, but also diseases, which killed Mexican soldiers. That made the home society vulnerable.
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
Johnson believed the Southern states should decide the course that was best for them. He also felt that African-Americans were unable to manage their own lives. He certainly did not think that African-Americans deserved to vote.
Explanation:
