Then the number must be between 18² = 324 and 19² = 361. But is that what you want to know?
Answer:
table:
.1, .25, .35, .2, .1
p(x=4) = .1
p(x<2) = .35
p(3≤x≤4)= .55
1.95, 1.12
Step-by-step explanation:
this is kind of hard to read, but i think i've got it
mean:
0*.1+1*.25+2*.35+3*.2+4*.1= 1.95
The second moment:
0²*.1+1²*.25+2²*.35+3²*.2+4²*.1= 5.05
the variance is the second moment minus the first moment squared (first moment is the mean) and then the standard deviation is the square root of the mean
5.05-1.95²= 1.2475 √1.2475= 1.1169 or 1.12
Answer:
option D or y = 7x + 2 is the answer
Number one would be 1.5 , 3 and number two would be 1.5 , 1
Answer: There is sufficient evidence to reject the dealer's claim that the mean price is at least $20,500
Step-by-step explanation:
given that;
n = 14
mean Ж = 19,850
standard deviation S = 1,084
degree of freedom df = n - 1 = ( 14 -1 ) = 13
H₀ : ц ≥ 20,500
H₁ : ц < 20,500
Now the test statistics
t = (Ж - ц) / ( s/√n)
t = ( 19850 - 20500) / ( 1084/√14)
t = -2.244
we know that our degree of freedom df = 13
from the table, the area under the t-distribution of the left of (t=-2.244) and for (df=13) is 0.0215
so P = 0.0215
significance ∝ = 0.05
we can confidently say that since our p value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis ( H₀ : ц ≥ 20,500 )
There is sufficient evidence to reject the dealer's claim that the mean price is at least $20,500
