The right option is the first, Mapp v. Ohio.
This case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 19, 1961, ruled (6–3), it was stated, strenghtened the effects of the exclusionary rule, which was debated in other cases (Bram v. United States, Wolf v. Colorado and others). It states that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures,” is inadmissible in all state courts.
Answer:
the right to practice religion and the right to criticize the government
Explanation:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
I'm pretty sure the answer is A: Allied Power Hope it helps
Answer:
The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Explanation:
pls mark me as brainleast and folow me
One similarity between the two is that they both introduced a new way of thinking.
