1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
5

Which statement does NOT support the claim than an unconditioned ethical directive such as the one the economic corporate social

responsibility demands of business management is inappropriate for utilitarian theory? a. Markets can work to prevent harm only by first-hand experience with harms that have to occur before they can be remedied. b. It is claimed that once market failures are adequately addressed by the government, business just needs to obey the law that addressed them. Business, however, has the ability to inappropriately influence government policy and the law. c. Business has the ability to influence consumers' desires by helping shape those desires through advertising. d. A more precise formulation of a utilitarian-based principle would be to maximize profit whenever doing so produces the greatest good for the greatest number, with the proviso that managers must consider the impact a decision will have in many ways other than merely financial.
Law
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

i just needed points ... sorry

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A bill about preserving the Red Fish in the Gulf of Mexico is brought to the floor and given a debate time of 60 minutes where e
kvv77 [185]
The correct answer is: Stage 5, where the bill goes to the floor And then that is where the floor debate occurs. I would appreciate if you mark Brainliest if helpful, thanks!
4 0
3 years ago
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland S
irina [24]

1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.

2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments.  Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.

<h3>What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?</h3>

The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:

  • Prevent terrorism
  • Enhance security
  • Secure and manage U.S. borders
  • Enforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.

Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.

Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:

  • Border security
  • Aviation security
  • Countering terrorism
  • Emergency response
  • Chemical facility inspection
  • IT and cybersecurity security
  • Natural disaster planning and response.

Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.

Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at brainly.com/question/19521614

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
The training of a forensic nurse is very specialized, finishing with a degree in both nursing and forensics.
Mama L [17]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its true

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three arguments in made in the masterpiece cakeshop v. colorado civil rights commission?
Papessa [141]

Explanation:

The opinion stated that although a baker, in his capacity as the owner of a business serving the public, "might have his right to the free exercise of his religion limited by generally applicable laws", a State decision in an adjudication “in which religious hostility on the part of the State itself” is a factor

hope this helps you

have a nice day:)

5 0
3 years ago
Most states require you to be ______ years old to run for governor, whereas you have to be _______ years old to run for presiden
postnew [5]

Answer:

At least 30 years old to run for governor.

At least 35 years old to run for presidential candidate.

State resident for at least 10 years to run for governor in Missouri and Oklahoma.

Presidential Candidate must have been a permanent resident of the US for 14 consecutive years.

Governor can serve 4-year terms for total of 2 terms

President can serve 4-year terms for total of 2 terms

I’m done idk

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the best definition of "government”?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the basic types of resources needed to produce goods and services?
    11·1 answer
  • What would be the effect of a
    15·1 answer
  • What is an illegal absence
    5·1 answer
  • This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
    9·1 answer
  • Which term refers to the legitimate writings that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery?
    13·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP! LAW QUESTION
    14·1 answer
  • When prices go higher, you can afford less of your favorite product, so you have you less
    9·1 answer
  • What is a good reason someone might get a credit card even if they never intend on using it? It helps build a positive credit hi
    9·1 answer
  • it is easier to incriminate a young person for infringing on copyright rules under the dmca than to incriminate an older person.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!