Answer:
manifest functions
Explanation:
The definition of manifest functions states that they are open, stated, and intended goals or consequences of activities within an organization or institution.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Its linda? i dont knowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
I believe the answer is: <span>formal operational
During </span>formal operational stage, most people would started to develop the ability to develop abstract concept which granted us the ability to create a hypothesis. On average, <span>formal operational stage happen when we're around 12 years old or older.</span>
