Answer:
affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.
Explanation:
This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:
MV = PQ
- M = quantity of money
- V = velocity of money
- P = price level
- Q = quantity of goods
Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:
- the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
- real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
- causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)
<span>Your task is to take this and construct a graphical representation of the data. in doing so, you determine that as the price of soup rises, the quantity of soup demanded decreases. This confirms the Law of Supply and Demand which states that the supply is inversely proportional to the demand. Simply speaking, whenever there is an increase in the price, the supplier tends to produce an excess supply even though the demand is low to generate a greater profit.</span>
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
The value of any money is determined by supplys and demands and the supplys and demands for other goods in the economy
Answer:
Dr cash $303,500
Cr common stock $133,500
Cr paid in capital in excess of par value $170,000
Second issue of shares:
Dr cash $74,000
Cr common stock $74,000
Explanation:
The cash received from the issuance of 44,500 at $3 par value is $303,500 which is to debited to cash and credited to common stock for$133,500 ($3*44,500) while the balance of $170,000 ($303,500-$133,500) is credited to paid in capital in excess par value account.
On the issuance of no par value common stock for cash of $74,000,the cash account is debited as usual with $74,000 while the common stock account is credited with same amount.
