Answer:
Wyatt
Explanation:
High outcome interpendence is a concept that encourages cooperation between members on a team. It shows that if a team wins all members will benefit, and if the team fails all members will be adversely affected.
In this scenario Wyatt who is a slacker in the team of Nick will stand to gain more.
In a high outcome interpendence scenario Nick will be forced to improve on the performance of Wyatt in order to meet team objectives.
The other average workers will only gain a little from increased cooperation.
Answer:
Letter E is correct. <u>Product disapprobation.</u>
Explanation:
In this matter, we can say that the factor that probably dictated the adaptation of Greengens products in this scenario was the product's disapproval.
This failure of the chocolate company Greengens was due to some management error and analysis of the market in question. When entering an international market, the company must analyze a series of important variables for the product to be accepted by the local public, no matter how standardized the product is, there are some local characteristics that should not be disregarded, such as local values, culture , needs, tastes, etc., which means that an adaptation of a product or service is necessary for it to be actually accepted and consumed in a given country.
Explanation:
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, based on inference, after consult relevant academic material, the learning objective on this particular assignment is stated below;
<em>"To think about things like your education, career goals, romantic relationships, how you get around, and your physical health, write at least one paragraph explaining how such aspects of your life would have changed had you lived in the early 1900s."</em>
Explanation:
I believe this is what you are asking for, Newton's law of gravitation.
The law of Newton's universal-gravitation states that every particle will attract every other particle in the universe. The force that attracts this is a force that is directly proportional to a product of the mass.
Answer and Explanation:
a. This is a fundamental risk case since there is a loss possibility. As the attack is done by the terrorists and the loss is definite in terms
b. It is a property risk as the house is damaged in a fire that resulted into a financial loss
c. It is a personal risk case as the head of the family is totally disabled that directly impact the family which leads to non-fulfillment of the financial liabilities so ultimately its an income loss.
d. It is a case of speculative as the investor purchase 100 shares that resulted in either profit or loss
e. This is a case of fundamental risk as the overflow of the river impacts the property of thousands people
f. This is a case of financial risk as the risk impacted the opposite changes in the price of the commodity, rate of interest, etc
g. It is a speculative case as the worker could either win or loss
